A Question about Value
When I went to Panama, I took my trusty Nikon D40 along with three of my four lenses, the 18-55mm, 55-200mm and a 35mm which I got about two week prior to my trip. As part of a personal experiment, I used mostly the 35mm. On my last day, I left behind that camera along with the 18-55mm and 55-200mm for my sister. I knew she wanted it; however, she was hesitant to ask for it… Ah, the things what the eldest one has to do… One of these days I will ask her to send me some of her pictures and put them here. Hope they will be good.
So, if I left that camera behind, what I have been using to take pictures? Well, after I came back, the following weekend I went out and got a shiny, brand new… Nikon D40!!! What? Why the hell would I get the same camera, if I had the almost perfect excuse to get a new one, like the D90? After all, this one has a lot more features that the D40, not to mention the ability to auto-focus my fourth lens (the Nikkor AF 50mm)!
Well, the answer to that question is value. Although I know I have pushed certain capabilities of the camera, I also know I still have a lot to learn. And, that is partially the reason I kept that 35mm lens with me. Since it can’t zoom, I am left with almost one thing to focus on: taking pictures. Now, that does not mean I won’t be getting other lenses anytime soon: I still have the 18-200mmm in mind. Likewise, someday I will get a D90 (though it will depend if other cameras will replace it in the future…). But, regardless, the point I am trying to make is that of what I find worthy today, right now. And that is the D40.
What does this have to do with a food blog, aside from that being a tool of this “trade”? Well, just like I find that camera worthy, other will consider it way superior to their point and shoot and yet another group will think there are better options. The same argument applies to food and restaurants. Fellow blogger (as of Friday, May 16th, it is “down”) Ben of Chowtimes mentioned a couple of times, readers “complains” they visited a couple too many run-of-the-mill, cheap sushi spots and, as a “foodie”, they should visit the more expensive, authentic ones. While I do think everybody should visit both instances, i.e., good ones and bad ones so they can have a better assessment of what is “good” and “bad” (for themselves and based on other opinions), at the end of the day, it boils down to what they consider to be worthy. From what I have read on their sushi related posts, there is something that entices them to visit them and they are satisfied after their visit. Who are we to “complain” about it?
On the other side of the coin is that of some cuisine being expensive, for example, Korean. While I do agree it is slightly more expensive than your usual restaurants, more often than not, I have found their food worth what they ask for. Then again, others do not think the same…
So, what does this mean? In my case, as a blogger, while I do think I should listen to my readers, at the same time, it is my blog and it is about my perspective of things. And what is my perspective? I feel that most restaurants that charge over $20 per dish is overrated. Food is something that should be accessible to everybody and, in my opinion, anything higher than that, well, it better be a good reason behind it! And, no, fancy ingredients won’t do it; learning to cook regardless of what you have as ingredients serves as a really good benchmark of your skills.
But, once again, am I cheap? I have spent decent amount in food, the most spent was birthday dinner with a friend (my treat). Every penny of the over $150 bill was worth it. So, what is your opinion about this? What you consider to be worthy?



i think sticking with what you’re comfortable with and what you love is a good choice
I personally believe there is a difference between eating out and dining out.
When dining out, the whole package has to be perfect to justify the $$ spent on a nice meal, not just the food served. Locale maybe, service, ambiance, etc. are part of that experience for me. At least that is my opinion.
Most definitely do I eat out more these days, the food still being the main focus, I then do not pay that much attention to the waiter, the unpolished silver ware, or that the Pizza joint is located in an industrial warehouse district.
Value is a very personal perception not just with food.
Thank you Kim! I get the same from other people too. I even got a big long complaint about the fact I went to Congee Noodle House and the sort because they are “cheap” places. Uh… correct me if I’m wrong but where would I get congee then? Should I go to Imperial and order a $20 congee? Would that me you feel better? No. If it tastes good, it’s good, doesn’t matter where. And yes, you are right again, it’s my blog, so I talk about stuff I eat. Glad you brought that up, I’m in the same boat.
I completely agree with you! I get readers complaining that I eat too much fast food…and that I bake too much. The truth is, I’m not going to spend extra money on food to satisfy a picky reader and afterall, it is MY blog.
Plus, some of the finer dining places, I refuse to take photos or even blog about because it is not the time or place to take photos. Taking photos in a Michelin star restaurant would be completely wrong to me.
I subscribe to your blog (and anyone else’ personal blog) because its got your personality, and posts don’t read as if they were churned out of a news machine. The decisions you make in the restaurants you visit as well as your own sense of value make up that personality.
If someone says ‘no, you should be going to xyz’, I think that is of no value to yourself and your regular readers, who expect to read something that reflects your own perspective. That person is probably a first time reader, doubtfully a returning one, and should go get their own blog or move on.
Such a generous brother you are!
How do you find the 35mm lens for photographing food? I also hear the 18-200mm is coming down in price since it is “aging” somewhat, hope you pick it up!
shokutsu, how are you doing? I hope you are doing fine since you haven’t been around… The 35mm is doing really good for close-up pictures, though the depth of field is a big tricky in some cases (just take a look around at the pictures!). Likewise, for general purposes, it is good; however, it fails when the subject is at a certain distance. Oh, well, that’s life. Actually, the 18-200 has gone UP! They used to be hovering around $750 but now it is over $800 (when no discounts are taken into consideratoin). No hurry into getting one anytime soon, anyway; however, I am now eyeing the 10-24mm and get another 55-200mm rather than the 18-200mm. Who knows, I might get something really stupid, hehehehe.
@KimHo
The Nikon 18-200 is a sweet lens, and I enjoyed using it when I used the school’s camera.