1) Can you elaborate as to why I can’t set up some expectations when I visit a restaurant? If I can’t do so, I will fail to see then reasons to drive accross town to visit a specific one if the one in the corner can just fill up my stomach. I believe that expectations is what drives us to find something better.
2) To make a really bad analogy, that person who can claim has no bias, go ahead and throw the first stone. Everybody has biases and, if you have read this blog long enough (something you have indicated you do), you will have a good idea of where some of these biases come from.
3) References are a necessary evil. I could go on and on by just saying I like/dislike something; but, by providing a reference point, that facilitate the explanation process of why I like/dislike something.
4) Freshly cut to order fries, while in concept sounds good, it is a bad idea. Good fries ought to be fried twice (if not more times) at different temperatures with a rest in between. The reason behind it is that the first time “cooks” the potatoes; the second time crisps it, which yields that crispy on the outside, fluffy in the inside a lot of people like. Wonder why people like McD’s fries? Tallow issue/addition of sugar aside, is the fact they are fried twice.
5) A burger is a sum of its parts. I believe it is lousy because it did not complement the burger. And, in the topic of the bun, I am not the only one who thought the bun could have been better…
6) I am flattered you compare me with a professional. That can only mean I have reached a level where people think I could be one – something I do not think I am nor claim to be!

As for proofreading, agreed, I could do a better job; however, taking into consideration that English is not my first (nor second, nor third) language, I think I am doing a hell of a good job – if I can say so myself!

You might benefit from having someone proofread your reviews before you post them like this.